The Supreme Court is about to decide whether to interfere in the election again
Ian Millhiser is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court.
While part of the Oregon Territory (1848-1853) three justices, appointed by the President of the United States, served on the ... outlined the structure of the judicial branch. The Supreme ...
Sandra Day O'Connor was the last justice who held elective office, as a state senator in Arizona. In today's court, every justice — other than Elena Kagan — has been a federal appellate judge. Kagan ...
The American public deserves to know what the presidential candidates plan to do about the Supreme Court of the United States ...
Since he was appointed Supreme Court chief justice by George ... but that was issued unsigned.“ In Fischer v. United ...
United States and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court. The decision in the former extended immunity to the president for "official acts," while the latter sharply curtailed ...
Clever railroad lawyers had the answer: Simply persuade the U.S. Supreme Court to declare corporate personhood, which would bring corporations the protections of the new 14th Amendment. Never mind ...
He observed that the Apex court's judgement reinforces the federal structure envisaged in the Constitution and provides an important source of revenue for the states.
Satyagraha has been launched at the entrance to the demolished Sarva Sewa Sangh in Rajghat, Varanasi, by a group of Gandhians ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback